A very conservative Tigres side allows River Plate brilliance

    Marcelo Gallardo's side managed to overcome both their regretful turf and a clumsy goal allowed by poor defending to draw a match that represents moral victory. The usual narrowness of River Plate's midfield diamond, however, wasn't tested by a Tigres squad that resorted to a five-man defensive line in which the wing backs didn't attempt any overlaps, thus isolating an otherwise dangerous attack. By the final whistle, River had outplayed their opposition in everything but the score.

Tigres, which saliently is a more expensive team in terms of individual market value than River Plate, according to a Brazilian consultancy firm, is a club widely renowned in the Mexican media for its traditional disdain to Copa Libertadores. Although in fairness to Tigres, many Mexican sides share that disdain/incapacity at the international level being the case that, for instance, domestic hegemon club León endured an early elimination last year to Bolivia's Bolívar. Tigres boss Ricardo Ferretti, apparently fed up with these criticisms, selected a 5-2-3 formation full of South American expertise with Libertadores champions Ecuadorean Joffre Guerrón and Brazilian Rafael Sobis in attack, plus Copa América winner Egidio Arévalo-Ríos in midfield.
         

River Plate, on the other hand, resorted to its prototypical 4-4-2 diamond formation with Leo Pisculichi at the tip, flanked by shuttlers Ariel Rojas and Carlos Sánchez. Colombian striker Teo Gutiérrez and Uruguayan striker Rodrigo Mora formed the offensive partnership but, fundamentally, also drifted to the channels to provide the width given the lack of true wingers this system entails. Considering the inclusion of Matías Kranevitter in the place of Leo Ponzio as the lone holding midfielder, this River Plate side remains unchanged from the squad that lifted the Copa Sudamericana some months ago.

As one can tell from the head image, the game's main tactical feature was Tigres's Guido Pizarro, deployed usually as a holding midfielder alongside Arévalo-Ríos in the Mexican league, playing as the sweeper within a trio of center backs. On paper that should've cancelled the Gutiérrez-Mora threat (and it did at least in what refers to protecting Nahuel Guzman's inner box), but the Mexican wing backs, Torres Nilo and Jiménez, stuck extremely close to their own goal line. This in turn left the middle of the pitch available to the workings of Pisculichi and, more important, to the surprise upsurges of Carlos Sánchez, who must have equalised well before his impressive scissor kick found the back of the net.

With the midfield completely surrendered by Tigres (whose basic strategy for that zone appeared to be committing cynical fouls to stop River's passing) the home side almost reached excellence with the ball. The numbers are cold but trustworthy: River shot 21 times (seven on target); Tigres, 6 times (four on target). Possession went 65 percent versus 35 percent. Peculiarly enough, the Mexican club resembled the cautious tactics and the radically conservative approach that the Mexican national team employed at the World Cup against the Netherlands once it took the early lead.

Other South American teams, most notably Atlético Nacional de Medellín and San Lorenzo de Almagro, have used a combination of full backs, wing backs and wingers to stretch the offensive play and drag River's diamond out of position. Of course, those matches were finals themselves and, in this case, Tigres were more than happy with collecting the away point. As it is likely that both teams will make it past group stage, we'll have to wait to see if River can show this level of brilliance against more adventurous opposition.